Over the past couple of months huge strides have been made in the development and deployments of several new free operating systems. While tracking their progress and goals, Iâ€™m writing down a couple of points for myself to revisit some time later and make an assessment.
Debian GNU/Linux: The universal operating system just shed a couple of architectures so that it is now that much less universal :-p. But nevertheless, with the â€œetchâ€ release, theyâ€™ve managed to stick it to the Ubuntu folks and have regained the trust of thousands of Linux enthusiasts all over the globe. In addition to the main release with over 20,000 packages spanning at least 3 DVDs, Debian also has a thriving sub-projects culture which is progressing quite steadily. These sub-projects cover specialised applications including Embedded Debian, Debian Junior, Debian Edu, Debian Lex. All these positive vibes should take Debian beyond the hard core GNU users base it currently enjoys. But, the project has to overcome issues such as the Firefox/Iceweasel, GNU Free Documentation fiasco which can irritate neutral users no end.
Overall Debian is on itâ€™s way to nirvana and helping itâ€™s users attain nirvana.
Ubuntu Linux: The hot favourite amongst the middle class of operating system users, Ubuntu has also taken a step ahead to ensure it reaches the masses. Ubuntu is now available as an option with Dell. This is sure great news for customers, as hardware incompatibility and other issues might not occur. Ubuntu also did great with their 6.06 LTS release. We ourselves have deployed the same at many corporates and institutions. Ubuntu comes with semi-annual releases.
Red Hat Enterprise Editions and their forks: These are interesting distributions. Red Hatâ€™s Enterprise Linux is just that. Itâ€™s enterpricey. Itâ€™s performance, Itâ€™s Ease of Use, Itâ€™s cost. Everything is so enterpricey. Some good souls have come out to give us less privileged folks, a taste of the enterpricey experience at a very less or at no cost. These include CentOS, Whitebox Linux. But the irony of the whole linux in enteprice is that Oracle themselves do a repackaging and provide support for Red Hat EL binaries. Why do they do that ? Simple. Oracle needs a base. According to them, Oracle itself can tune the kernel, support programs they develop on oracle.
Fedora Linux: What started as Red Hatâ€™s staging area (??) is now a full blown enterprise capable distribution. It has a huge community built around who takes care of the packaging to the bug fixes, etc. Truly Red Hat has delivered itâ€™s word that Fedora wonâ€™t be controlled by Red Hat.
Now the above Operating Systems were purely Linux based. What makes the scene much more interesting is that there are a couple of contenders for the growing (yet again) base of Unix users. These include Sunâ€™s OpenSolaris, the BSDs.
Sun has been doing some real marketing amongst developers out there to adopt OpenSolaris for their development purposes. They have made available cutting edge tools including DTrace, ZFS available under an open source license. There have been several instances where attempts to port these to Linux/BSD are going on furiously. But Sun isnâ€™t satisfied. The developers still do not trust Sun to play along nicely along open source rules. So, Sun has come up with something called Project Indiana. This has Ian Murdock (The Ian in Debian, Progeny founder) at itâ€™s helm. He looks like he has some tricks up his sleeve. Letâ€™s see if he can turn it around.
Thereâ€™s also this project called Nexenta, which is again a Debian based distribution but uses Solaris kernel at itâ€™s heart. And tries to recreate the Solaris environment.
Projects, there are some
There are people using them
At office and home
Who does rule the roost
Will not necessarily be the best
But, try certainly will be doing the most